7 thoughts on “About

  1. Bravo, Mr. Wall on the traffic court victory. I too always contest tickets, etc and last Summer went all the way to jury trial for another victimless “crime” and won a complete aquittal in the case due in part because the arresting officers destroyed video evidence and then lied about it on the witness stand.
    I have shamefully accepted the “lesser crime” option (the fine was lower in my case) in the past when I did not have the where with all to try the case. I commend your efforts and take joy in your success.
    Peace,
    Keith Snyder
    The People’s Republik of New York
    Brooklyn Sector

    • Thanks, Keith! It’s gratifying to have beat the system, but it took so much time that I’ve really been focusing on just following their ridiculous rules so as to avoid having to deal with them again. Of course, that’s not entirely within my control, as they’re driven by quotas and can find any reason they want to target people for revenue.

  2. Congratulations on your success. Future reference, the so-called “traffic stop” is actually an arrest. Check your vehicle code for the procedures that apply to the cops when they stop people. They’re procedures on ARRESTS, not “traffic stops” or “detentions”. Technically it’s a WARRANTLESS ARREST. The question is, did the cop witness a crime? A FINE ONLY offense is NOT a crime. There’s no jail time upon conviction, you don’t get a jury trial and you don’t get an attorney paid for at public expense. You’ll also note that you were NOT Mirandized. Had you been you’d have been informed you’d be entitled to an attorney if you couldn’t afford one. You don’t get an attorney paid for by the public for NON-CRIMINAL behavior.

    Cops ARE NOT authorized to arrest without a warrant for NON-CRIMINAL behavior, but that’s what they’re doing, nation wide I might add. If I were you I’d find out what a FINE ONLY offense is called. In California and New York they’re called “infractions” and in California, like New York, infractions ARE NOT CRIMES! The cop made a mistake, he/she DID NOT witness any crime and they didn’t have a warrant. We’re being subjected to false imprisonment and the cop was the one who actually broke the law!

    Further, the Vehicle Code regulates those engaged in a PROFESSION or OCCUPATION. DRIVING is a PROFESSION – OCCUPATION. Next time you see a cab driver ask him what class driver license he has. It’s the same class you were issued. The LICENSE permits the issuee to charge a fee to transport PASSENGERS and property. A PASSENGER pays to be taken from Point A to Point B. Do the people who sit with you when you go somewhere in your car pay you to ride along? If not then they’re not correctly identified by the term PASSENGER.

    The cops are applying COMMERCIAL rules to NON-COMMERCIAL behavior. If you’re not in the BUSINESS of TRANSPORTATION then how can you possibly violate a rule that applies to the TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS?

    We’ve been lied to for a very long time, but don’t believe me, believe your own eyes: http://section520.org/car.html, http://section520.org/points.html

  3. Comment for Jack and Jared. ALL LAW IS CONTRACTUAL. USC TITLE 28 § 3002 [15] [A] ‘‘United States’’ means—
    (A) a Federal corporation; (B) an agency, department, commission,
    board, or other entity of the United States; or (C) an instrumentality of the United States. Every State in the Union is a corporation, they are incorporated into the United States. Every State has a federal tax i.d. number, for its State employees. Jared, read the N.J. State
    Constitution Article I Rights and Privileges. 1. All persons are by nature free and independent, and have certain natural and unalienable rights, among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty, of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and of pursuing and obtaining safety and happiness. 2. a. All political power is inherent in the people. Government is instituted for the protection, security, and benefit of the people, and they have the right at all times to alter or reform the same, whenever the public good may require it.

    Now, since I have defined for you that governments are corporations [title 28 § 3002] then under clause 2. a. of the N.J. Const. I can substitute the word “Government” and replace it with the word “Corporation”, i.e. [the] Corporation is instituted for the protection, security, and benefit of the people . . . .

    So, if all persons are by nature free and independent, then the only thing that would change that would be some explicit contract with
    the corporate State of New Jersey! In contracts, there can be
    nothing implied because the People of the State of New Jersey
    demand full disclosure before explicitly signing a contract. Nothing
    can be withheld, otherwise that would be Constructive Fraud. Can I knock on a strangers door and imply that I have a contract with him and demand that he pay me a certain sum of money for the license to own a dog? The answer is NO!

    Lets go to the Supreme Contract [The Constitution for the United States of America] and see what it says about freedom and independence. Let me define what Supreme means.

    U.S. Const. Article VI.
    *This Constitution*, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, *shall be the supreme Law of the Land*; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

    The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, *and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution;*

    By the way, judges, prosecutors and cops are under the executive branch of the government [corporation].

    U.S. Const. Article IV. Sec. 4.
    Section. 4. The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic Violence.

    Republican government. One in which the powers of sovereignty are vested in the people *and are exercised by the people, either directly*, or through representatives chosen by the people, to whom those powers are specially delegated. [In re Duncan, 139 U.S. 449, 11 S.Ct. 573, 35 L.Ed. 219; Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162, 22 L.Ed. 627.” Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, p. 626.]

    So it is, that the People of this so called country, are free and independent to manage their own lives, unless they want to contract and hire the United States and the State wherein you reside, to manage your life for you. They are basically a management company, that has gone rogue!!!

    To further drive home the point of freedom, choice and independence, read the XIII amendment: [there shall be no involuntary servitude]

    XIII Amendment to the U.S. Const.
    Section 1.
    Neither slavery *nor involuntary servitude*, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

    In conclusion, the big secret is, you never want to say that you are a fourteen amendment citizen, if so, then you are under the jurisdiction [power and corporate policies] of the United States and the State wherein you reside, do you get? You might ask, “Well then what are we?” We are the People, contemplated in the Preambles of the federal and state constitutions, free and independent.

    Amendment XIV
    Section 1.
    All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

    The 14th amendment is a two part definition, if it was compulsory to be a citizen, then it would read this way: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. But it doesn’t read that way, you have to voluntarily submit to the jurisdiction.

    Watch this small clip and pay attention at the 2:45 min mark and the 3:29 min mark. The useful idiot border patrol agent asks the man to state his citizenship and then he says that he is doing everything according to policy, do you get it??

    With regards to driving, the People have an inherent right to travel on the public roads, without being regulated [molested] by State corporations. Drivers licenses are for the purpose of Commerce, if the people choose to contract with the U.S. or State for the purpose of Commerce. The People are free to secure prosperity for themselves with out the help of the State or U.S.

    Jack you cited corporate policy i.e. State
    statutory code and in order for statutory code to apply to anyone

    • Todd, that was a very interesting read. Thanks for taking the time to share it. I have a lot to learn on this subject, but I agree with the logical conclusions of everything you said.

  4. Todd, the vast majority of people are completely unaware there’s both a state and federal citizen. One’s MUCH better than the other. The latter is a MEMBER of a COMPANY/CORPORATION named United States. Members of US Inc are called US citizens or United States citizens. I’m not a MEMBER of that COMPANY/CORPORATION any more. I quit! I reclaimed my original status and hence am not subject to the Vehicle Code. I haven’t had a driver license in nearly 25 years, nor do I register my cars any more because I’m not involved in the TRANSPORTATION business as a DRIVER. So the majority of people will HAVE TO use the statutes in order to get through the BS that plays out in Traffic Court when they’re stopped for some alleged violation of it. I can make an argument (status), 99.9% of everyone else can’t.

    The bottom line is that the Vehicle Code regulates COMMERCIAL use of the streets and highways, they’re BUSINESS RULES and only apply to those engaged in the PROFESSION or OCCUPATION of DRIVER. When the cop pulls someone over they’re technically alleging that someone BROKE A BUSINESS RULE. The majority of cops don’t know this. The KEY to understanding what the PRIVILEGE is that the LICENSE permits, is the LICENSE it self. Unless people know what a LICENSE is they’ll never figure out what DRIVING is. IT’S A BUSINESS! DRIVING IS COMMERCIAL BEHAVIOR!

    On another note, cops are pulling someone over right now. The “pulling over” is actually an ARREST. The cop’s authority to arrest without a warrant is limited to crime. 99.9% of all so-called “traffic stops” are for INFRACTIONS or FINE ONLY OFFENSES. Fine Only Offenses ARE NOT CRIMES! Cops are making WARRANTLESS ARRESTS for NON-CRIMINAL behavior. You want to “beat a ticket”? When you have the cop on the stand ask him/her if they were authorized to do what they did. They’ll say YES. Now what if it turns out there IS NO AUTHORIZATION for what they did? They testify under penalty of perjury right? They will have ADMITTED they complied with a rule that doesn’t exist. There is NO AUTHORIZATION for any cop to make a WARRANTLESS ARREST for NON-CRIMINAL behavior and that’s what 99.9% of traffic stops are for: FINE ONLY NON-CRIMINAL offenses.

    …infractions are not crimes…

    …upon the rationale the Legislature did not intend to classify infractions as crimes.
    People v. Sava (1987) 190 Cal.App.3d 935

    That’s the ONLY case in California history that contains those four words: …infractions are not crimes… And that case HAS NOT been overturned! People are being subjected to FALSE IMPRISONMENT by cops, and THAT’S a crime!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s